Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. of Chattanooga v. Flowers
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
This is a suit by Flowers to recover sick benefits alleged to have accrued upon an accident and health insurance policy in his favor issued by appellant dated November 8, 1933. The policy was issued without medical examination upon Flowers’ written application therefor bearing the same date as the policy, a copy of which was attached to and made a part of such policy. The application provides that the policy was not to be effective unless delivered while the applicant was in good health and free from the effects of any injury, disease, or bodily infirmity.
In bar of the suit…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. EndeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. RagsdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Chase Bag Co. v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Ford Motor Co. v. MaddinTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Dossett v. Franklin Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Union Bankers Insurance Co. v. SheltonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Allen v. American National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- Clark v. National Life & Accident InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1947
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. BoysenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. MaysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.