City and County of San Francisco v. Garnett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI,
J. — Family Code section 4071.5 provides that if welfare payments are being made for a child, a parent’s child support obligation may not be reduced by the discretionary hardship deductions that would otherwise be available to the parent. In this case the trial court refused to apply section 4071.5, finding it unconstitutional on equal protection grounds. We reverse. The wisdom and fairness of the statute are debatable, but that debate belongs in the Legislature. Section 4071.5 is rationally related to the legitimate state purpose of recouping welfare payments from parents who…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Z.W. v. E.R. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020