Legal Opinion

Urban v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1931No. 212PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

The indictment in this case charged that E. L. Russell, Zig Urban, Zig Urban, Jr., Carl Lombardi and Carmen De Cola did unlawfully conspire to possess and transport whisky, contrary to the provisions of the National Prohibition Act, on May 1, 1928, and thence continuously until March 17, 1929; and that, in the furtherance of such conspiracy, Urban, Sr., Lombardi and De Cola on May 1, 1928, agreed to pay G. J. Wargin thirty dollars per week for the use of the Wargin ranch as a place to cache and conceal whisky; that Russell transported whisky to such ranch and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Colburn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Ashbaugh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Meadows v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  2. Baish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  3. Carpenter v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  4. Romero Náter v. JonesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  5. Paul v. ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API