Legal Opinion
Baish v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1937No. 1505PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.
An indictment was returned against Richard Forgino, Arthur Baish, and Marie Baish charging that in February, 1936, they transported, caused to be transported, and aided and assisted in the transportation of, Rose Forgino from Denver, Colo., to Laramie, Wyo., for the purpose of having her engage in prostitution in violation of the act approved June 25, 1910 (section 2, 18 U. S.C.A. § 398). All of them were found guilty. Marie Baish prosecutes this appeal alone.
The sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment is challenged. There was testimony establishing these…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Thiede v. Utah TerritorySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Coulston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- United States v. PapeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.