Clarke v. Allianz Global Risks U.S. Insurance
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TERRY R. MEANS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 13) and Amended Motion for Judicial Notice (doc. # 15). 1 After review, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has presented no evidence that he complied with the conditions precedent under the policy at issue. The Court further concludes that the evidence establishes that Defendant suffered prejudice as a matter of law. Consequently, the motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. 2
I. Background
In March 2002, Plaintiff, Gary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Forsyth v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Companion Property & Casualty Insurance v. OpheimDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
- Manchester Texas Financial Group, LLC v. ACE American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Vela Wood PC v. Associated Industries Insurance Company IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020