Scott v. Huston
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 4, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 112, refusing to take'off .nonsuit in case of James Scott v. James A. Huston, David P. Black, James N. Jarvis and William S. VanDyke. Trespass for false representations.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 4, Oct. T., 1914, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 112, refusing to take'off .nonsuit in case of James Scott v. James A. Huston, David P. Black, James N. Jarvis and William S. VanDyke. Trespass for false representations. Frazer, P. J., filed the following opinion : The plaintiff in this action sought to recover from defendants damages for alleged false representations made at the time of the purchase by plaintiff from defendants of certain shares of stock. The facts as shown by the testimony at the trial were substantially as follows: In 1903…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the learned president judge of the Common Pleas, refusing to take off the nonsuit entered at the trial.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Klerlein v. WernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932