RAYMOND O. WASHINGTON v. UNITED STATES
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Senior Judge:
A jury found appellant, Raymond O. Washington, guilty of drug offenses. 1 He contends that (1) the trial court under mined the presumption of innocence and plainly erred by admitting evidence that he was on release when the drug offenses occurred; (2) his Sixth Amendment constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel was violated because his trial counsel failed to object to. the admission of evidence regarding the commission of the crimes during his release on another crime; 2 and (3) some of his convictions must merge. For the reasons stated below, we affirm Mr.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ALAZAJUAN M. GRAY and CLIFTON SMITH v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- ALAZAJUAN M. GRAY and CLIFTON SMITH v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016