Legal Opinion

American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 27, 1960No. C.D. 2188PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is so-called cutback asphalt. There does not seem to be any question but that it consists of solid asphalt mixed with 20 per centum of a kerosene-like distillate of petroleum, so that the resultant product, in its condition as imported, is in a liquid state.

The cutback asphalt in issue was admitted to free entry under the provision in paragraph 1710, Tariff Act of 1930, for—

Limestone-rocli asphalt; asphaltum and bitumen,

but a tax or duty at the rate of *4 cent per gallon was assessed and collected under the provision in section…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  3. Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. CJ Van Houten & Zoon v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  2. Bakelite Thermosets, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  3. Ultra Ray Pearl Essence Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API