American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mollison, Judge:
The merchandise the subject of this protest is so-called cutback asphalt. There does not seem to be any question but that it consists of solid asphalt mixed with 20 per centum of a kerosene-like distillate of petroleum, so that the resultant product, in its condition as imported, is in a liquid state.
The cutback asphalt in issue was admitted to free entry under the provision in paragraph 1710, Tariff Act of 1930, for—
Limestone-rocli asphalt; asphaltum and bitumen,
but a tax or duty at the rate of *4 cent per gallon was assessed and collected under the provision in section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Aetna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Rockhill & VietorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
3Cited by14 opinions
- CJ Van Houten & Zoon v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Bakelite Thermosets, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Ultra Ray Pearl Essence Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.