Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Abingdon Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 7, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 2810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action purportedly between citizens of different states with the required jurisdictional amount present. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) (1), (c). The defendant Abingdon Motor Company (Abingdon) undertook to remove it from a state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Its codefendant Ford Motor Company did not join in the removal.

The defendant Abingdon filed a motion to dismiss the action for insufficient service of process. Rule 12(b) (5), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In considering such motion, the Court is obliged to notice its apparent want of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. D. Bradley v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Williams v. W. R. Grace & Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1966

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers of America v. Jarl Extrusions, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1974
  2. Coogan v. DeBoer Properties Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1973
  3. Printing Specialties & Paper Products District Council No. 2 v. International Printing & Graphic Communications UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API