Legal Opinion

United Steelworkers of America v. Jarl Extrusions, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided October 7, 1974No. CIV-2-74-144PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

It appearing from the complaint herein that the plaintiff is a unit through which employees of the corporate defendant bargained collectively with such defendant, and that the plaintiff undertook to sue the defendants as the representative party of a class of approximately 85 employees, Rule 23(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it further appearing by reasonable inference that each of such employees is a resident of this jurisdiction and is represented by the plaintiff; and it appearing finally that the aforementioned class is not so numerous that joinder of all…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. William E. Arnold Co. v. Carpenters District CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Holden Brown, George House and George Wolff v. Sterling Aluminum Products Corporation, a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mays v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  2. Printing Specialties & Paper Products District Council No. 2 v. International Printing & Graphic Communications UnionDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978
  3. United Steelworkers of America Local 8024 v. Jarl Extrusions, IncCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Independent School District 89 v. Bolain Equipment, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Kohntopp v. ButcherDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API