Clark v. Wilson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
Herman T. Clark, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in response to the freezing of his prison trust account. Clark’s only claim on appeal is that a prison official violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to procedural due process by failing to provide notice and a hearing before freezing his account. The district court denied the prison official’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and this appeal followed. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we REVERSE the denial of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Gad v. Kansas State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Estate of Jimma Pal Reat v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Tenorio v. PitzerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.