Legal Opinion

Clark v. Wilson

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 22, 2010No. 09-6219PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Herman T. Clark, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in response to the freezing of his prison trust account. Clark’s only claim on appeal is that a prison official violated his Fourteenth Amendment right to procedural due process by failing to provide notice and a hearing before freezing his account. The district court denied the prison official’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, and this appeal followed. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we REVERSE the denial of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Gad v. Kansas State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  2. Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  3. Estate of Jimma Pal Reat v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  5. Tenorio v. PitzerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API