Legal Opinion

Jahn v. Berzon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 1933 the appealing defendant had failed to pay a tax assessed upon a tract of vacant land and the lien was sold to the plaintiff by the procedure then in force. Subsequently the plaintiff commenced this action for the foreclosure of the lien and the owner was joined with others as a party, but did not appear or make any defense. The *1024premises were divided and residences erected thereon and mortgaged. Later, some parts of the improved premises were sold to others, apparently for homes. The city of New Rochelle, in selling and transferring the tax lien, assumed to act on Local Law No. 5 [of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Matter of of N.Y., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. County Securities, Inc. v. SeacordNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. People Ex Rel. Lewis v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missionary Baptist State Convention v. Wimberly Chapel Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Fantis Foods, Inc. v. Standard Importing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Town of Babylon v. ConteNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Robin v. Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Commissioner of Social Services ex rel. Foreman v. MilienNew York City Family Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API