Legal Opinion

Rahul K. Nath, M.D. v. Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2014No. 12-0620PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Guzman

in which Chief Justice HECHT, Justice JOHNSON, Justice WILLETT, and Justice DEVINE joined.

In a civil suit, few areas of trial court discretion implicate a party’s due process rights more directly than sanctions. This proceeding involves one of the highest reported monetary sanctions awards in Texas history stemming from baseless pleadings and one of the largest such awards in the United States.1 Further, the award was levied against a party rather than an attorney. The Civil Practice and Remedies Code and our Rules of Civil Procedure allow for pleadings sanctions against parties and attorneys…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Verburgt v. DornerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. First United Pentecostal Church of Beaumont v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Christus Health Gulf Coast v. CarswellTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Eric B. Darnell v. Carmen Broberg and Michael J. Zimprich, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
  4. www.urban.inc. v. Chris Drummond, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2016
  5. Zhou Pei and Shaun White v. Nicholas White, Mark Moersen, Taurus Manufacturing Co. and Optimas Manufacturing Solutions, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API