Legal Opinion
Gasparik v. FNMA
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 1, 2016No. 16-cv-147-AJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Bridget Gasparik v. Case No. 16-cv-147-AJ Opinion No.
2016 DNH 215
Federal National Mortgage Association O R D E R In an action removed from state court, the plaintiff, Bridget Gasparik, alleges that Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) violated state and federal law when it foreclosed upon a home in Danbury, New Hampshire. Doc. no. 13. Fannie Mae moves to dismiss this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Doc. no. 14. The plaintiff objects. Doc. no. 15. For the following…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Rivera v. Centro Medico De Turabo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Hochendoner v. Genzyme CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Julius v Wells FargoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017