Legal Opinion

State v. Hulsey

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1968No. 3268PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCeawpoed, P. J.

The essential portion of the affidavit charging the offense of which defendant, appellant herein, was convicted by the court without a jury reads: v

“ # * * on or about the 25th day of January A. D., 1966, in the city of Kettering, and in the connty of Montgomery and in the state of Ohio, one Vergie Hulsey, 851 Orchard Drive, Kettering, Ohio, did telephone repeatedly the said Rose Catherine Schaeublin for the sole purpose of harassing the said Rose Catherine Schaeublin at 2624 Wehrly Drive, Kettering, Ohio, contrary to Section 4931.31 of the Ohio Revised Code * *

The complainant, Schaeublin,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Rocco Dote and Theodore P. Veesart, United States of America v. Nick Guglielmo and Joseph B. Delmonico, A/K/A Joey D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donley v. City of Mountain BrookCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Bixler v. HilleWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Ex Parte DonleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Zinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API