Discover Bank ex rel. SA Discover Finance Service, L.L.C. v. Cox
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CAROL M. HANSEN, Judge.
T1 Plaintif{/Appellant, Discover Bank (Creditor), seeks review of the trial court's order denying it judgment against Garnish ee/Appellee, G. Duane1 Cowdin (Garnishee), and releasing Garnishee from garnishment. We affirm because the trial court's order is not contrary to law.
12 Creditor filed a garnishment against Garnishee, alleging Garnishee was indebted to Creditor's judgment debtor, Defendant Richard Cox (Debtor). Garnishee answered, stating,
*249Garnishee is obligated to [Debtor] for monthly mortgage payments of approximately $1,147.00 under a Contract for Deed. This is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Brooks v. FieldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- First Mustang State Bank v. Garland Bloodworth, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Stalcup v. EasterlySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Discover Bank v. BarnesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- PARSON v. FARLEYCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2025