Legal Opinion

Stalcup v. Easterly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1960No. 38559PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

The parties who occupy the same relative positions here as in the trial court, will be referred to herein as they appeared in the trial court.

■ Plaintiffs sold city property to defendants. As of date of sale the property was subject to an insured FHA and a GI loan. It was provided in the deed from plaintiffs to defendants, and in a contract entered into in connection with the sale, that defendants assumed and agreed to pay the referred-to loans. Defendants failed to timely satisfy the provisions of the loans and the mortgages securing the loans were foreclosed. The proceeds of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comstock v. . DrohanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Johnson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land Office v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'n v. LudiArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Glover v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Straight v. James Talcott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API