Legal Opinion

Goshert v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1910No. 8559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered October 1, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing an action for an injunction, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.

The plaintiffs, taxpayers and residents of the city of Seattle, commenced this action for the purpose of enjoining the city and its board of public works from entering into a contract with the Star Electric Company for fur*646nishing the city with equipment for a fire alarm central office. Prior to the trial of the case, certain other taxpayers were permitted to intervene as plaintiffs. After a hearing on the merits, judgment was entered dismissing the case and taxing the costs to the plaintiffs and the interveners. The correctness of the judgment is challenged by this appeal.

In January, 1908,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mazet v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Fones Hardware Co. v. ErbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. People Ex Rel. Coughlin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stern v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Payne v. Grossart, AuditorIndiana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API