Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.
¶ 83. {concurring). I join only the majority opinion's conclusion that American Family Mutual Insurance Company's (American Family) policy does not provide coverage for the misrepresentations1 and the negligent construction that the jury found. I write separately because: (1) the *533majority opinion appears to misread Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, 280 Wis. 2d 1, 695 N.W.2d 298; (2) the majority opinion employs disputed facts that the jury did not find in order to support its reasoning; and (3) the claim for coverage due to Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.'s (Weisflog's Showroom) negligent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.