Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2008No. 2005AP1287Published

1ConcurrencePatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 83. {concurring). I join only the majority opinion's conclusion that American Family Mutual Insurance Company's (American Family) policy does not provide coverage for the misrepresentations1 and the negligent construction that the jury found. I write separately because: (1) the *533majority opinion appears to misread Everson v. Lorenz, 2005 WI 51, 280 Wis. 2d 1, 695 N.W.2d 298; (2) the majority opinion employs disputed facts that the jury did not find in order to support its reasoning; and (3) the claim for coverage due to Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.'s (Weisflog's Showroom) negligent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kaloti Enterprises, Inc. v. Kellogg Sales Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wurtz v. FleischmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API