Legal Opinion

In Re Mundell

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1906No. Crim. No. 30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPLICATION for writ of habeas corpus to a probation officer appointed by the Juvenile Court of Los Angeles County which awarded to him the custody of a minor child of applicant’s. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Petitioner, the father of a female child, alleges that she is restrained of her liberty by one Dodds, which restraint is unlawful in that the child is so restrained under an order of the superior court of Los Angeles county, sitting in special session as a juvenile court under the law of the state relating to dependent children, that such child is not a dependent child under such act.

The return of Dodds shows that, upon the filing of a petition in which it was alleged that said child was of the age of fifteen years, and was a dependent child under the act approved February 26, 1903, in this,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. In Re CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. In Re OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Moore v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API