Legal Opinion

State v. Hutchins

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 8, 2000No. 98-467PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRODERICK, j.

The defendant, Michael Hutchins, was acquitted on three counts of sexual assault following a jury trial. One additional charge was nolle prossed at the close of the trial. Subsequently, the defendant was indicted for perjury based upon his testimony at trial. The defendant moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that a subsequent trial is barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel and thus would violate the protections afforded him by the Double Jeopardy Clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions. The Trial Court (Fitzgerald, J.) denied the motion and the defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. United States v. Richard A. HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Z. A. Adams and Jean Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. Estelle O. NashCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GlennSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. State v. MichaudSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State of New Hampshire v. Charles Glenn, Jr.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  4. Steven Christopher Sevachko v. Commonwealth of VACourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Sevachko v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API