Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sevachko v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided June 13, 2000No. Record No. 2513-98-2Published

1ConcurrenceAnnunziata, Judge

I concur in the majority decision but write separately to underscore the factual predicate of the decision and to make clear the limits of our holding. As noted by the majority opinion, the United States Supreme Court in Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970), held that the principle of collateral estoppel is embodied in the double jeopardy protections afforded under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. See also Simon v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 412, 258 S.E.2d 567 (1979). Its application in our adversary system of justice “means simply that when an…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. FielCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Z. A. Adams and Jean Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API