Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Burns
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1940No. Civ. 12464PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of respondents after the trial court sustained without leave to amend a general demurrer to a petition for a writ of mandate requiring respondent Board of Pension Commissioners to prepare a budget for the fire and police pension fund, eliminating therefrom estimated receipts and requiring respondent City Council to levy a tax to meet the requirements of said budget, petitioners appeal.
Section 186 of the Charter of the City of Los Angeles since its amendment in 1933 reads as follows:
“Sec. 186. (1) For the purpose of providing and maintaining a fund to meet the payments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Graves v. PurcellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- People v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People ex rel. Chadwick v. SergelIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- White v. HarrelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Rowe v. Stanley CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- England v. Moore Equipment Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1950
- County of Los Angeles v. EmmeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941