Northern Insurance of New York v. Olmstead
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
Pending before this Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and/or Motion to Stay Proceedings (Doc. No. 3). For the following reasons, the Court will deny Defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
In April 2001 Defendant Carl Olm-stead was involved in an automobile accident in which he was struck by another vehicle. At the time of the accident, Olm-stead was employed by Sauder Woodwork*925ing Company (“Sander”), which maintained a commercial anto and general liability (“CGL”) insurance policy issued by Plaintiff Northern Insurance of New York (“Northern”). Defendant’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Beverly Roumph, Individually and as Next Friend of Lavina Roumph Lavina RoumphCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Dawn MercierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Northbrook National Insurance v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.