Legal Opinion
Kincaid v. WEK Drilling Co., Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 28, 1989No. 11124PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Claimant Larry Kincaid (Kincaid) appeals from a compensation order awarding him benefits for 10% permanent partial disability, contending that he should have been awarded benefits for permanent total disability. Kincaid was injured on April 7, 1987. Due to the date of the accident, this case arises under transient provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. See NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to-68 (Orig.Pamp. & Cum.Supp.1986) (Interim Act). This appeal is another in a series of cases arising under the Interim Act and presenting this court with a question concerning the meaning…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Baca v. Bueno FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Varos v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gough v. Famariss Oil and Refining CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Maloof v. San Juan County Valuation Protests BoardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- Carpenter v. Arkansas Best Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Garcia v. HerreraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.