Legal Opinion
Reimer v. City of O'Neill
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1972No. 38390PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
The plaintiffs own and operate a trailer court in O’Neill, Nebraska. They commenced this action against the City of O’Neill and its officials to enjoin enforcement of the ordinances prescribing water rates and sewer use charges in O’Neill and to recover alleged overchargés.
The trial court found generally for the defendants and dismissed the action. The plaintiffs appeal.
The controversy centers around the'minimum charges imposed by the ordinances in question. Ordinance No. 393A, prescribing water rates, provides a minimum bimonthly charge of $4 per resident consumer for the “First 10,000…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. M. C.C. of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Caldwell v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Knotts v. NollenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- City of Kermit v. RushCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hall v. Cox Cable of Omaha, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Shawnee Hills Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Rural Water District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975