Legal Opinion

Knotts v. Nollen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 13, 1928PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

The ultimate question is whether the rate or classification given by defendants to apartment houses constitutes an unlawful discrimination against them. Defendants’ classification of such buildings for rate purposes is as follows:

“Apartment houses, tenement houses, etc., shall be rated as residences; each suite or set of rooms or apartments occupied separately being rated as one residence.’’

In addition to service and special charges, defendants have prescribed a sliding meter rate of 30 cents for the first 1,000 gallons per day, 20 cents per 1,000 for the next 4,000 gallons or less per day,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Hubbell v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Cedar Rapids Gas Light Co. v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Gilliam v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Shawnee Hills Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Rural Water District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  5. Oradell Villages. v. Tp. of WayneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API