Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Baker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1968No. 36829Published

1DissentMcCown, J.

The defendant was obviously guilty of larceny. However, he was charged and convicted of an aggravated statutory form of burglary. The evidence was undisputed that he had permission to enter the building at the time and place to do custodial work, and that he performed such work.

Section 28-533, R. R. S. 1943, has two separate elements: First, the unlawful entry and second, the committing or attempting to commit one of the acts enumerated after entry. See Fredericksen v. Dickson, 148 Neb. 739, 29 N. W. 2d 334.

The rule is supportable that an unlawful or malicious intent at the time of entry may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fredericksen v. DicksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API