State ex rel. Lowery v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Here, the city submitted the records for in camera inspection, presented evidence and argument to support its claimed exemptions to public release, and asked the court to decide the issues. Under the circumstances, the city cannot now claim it lacked a fair opportunity to present evidence to support its claimed exemptions.
We agree that public officials must be given an adequate opportunity to present evidence about claimed exemptions. “A governmental body refusing to *128release records has the burden of proving that the records are excepted from disclosure by R.C. 149.43.” State ex rel. Natl.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Lester v. LeuckOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Marshall v. AaronOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Houk v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Center Ridge Ganley, Inc. v. StinnOhio Supreme Court · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Todd Development Co. v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State ex rel. J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc. v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.