Legal Opinion
Oros v. Mayor of Baltimore
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 15, 1983No. 279, 317 and 318, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOWE, Judge.
The three appellants in these cases are all Baltimore City police officers injured in the course of their employment, who (pursuant to a General Order promulgated by the Baltimore Police Department) were paid in full under a sick leave policy during their absence from work. The police officers did not claim temporary total disability during their absence from work since the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Md.Ann.Code, Art. 101, § 33(c), states that when employees of the State or its subdivisions are provided with such benefits by their employers, the benefits will satisfy and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mazor v. State, Dep't of CorrectionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Frank v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Nooe v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Belschner v. Anchor Post Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Feissner v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blevins v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Newman v. Subsequent Injury FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Miller v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Reger v. Washington County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Mayor of Baltimore v. OrosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.