Legal Opinion
Black v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 27, 1940No. Nos. 175, 176Published
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
These actions were brought by the plaintiff to recover upon two policies of insurance issued by the defendant upon the life of Ernest T. Black. By agreement of counsel they were tried by the court without a jury.
There is no conflict in the evidence, the facts being undisputed.
Policy No. 775803 bears date of November 6, 1930, while policy No. 779112 is dated December 20, 1930. In all other respects the policies are identical and the plaintiff is named as beneficiary in both policies.
Six annual premiums were paid on both policies. From time to time the insured borrowed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greeff v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Rhine v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Schoonover v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Neal v. Columbian Mutual Life Assurance SocietyMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.