Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Crooks

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion by purchasers upon sale under interlocutory judgment^ in an action for partition, to be relieved from their purchase.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The marketability of the title is questioned, not by reason of matters connected with the source or the chain of title, but because of asserted defects in the proceedings in this action.

Examining the points raised, I conclude that the objections made-by the purchasers are not tenable, and that the motion should be denied for the reasons following:

(1.) The fact of the death, without issue, of John Grady was-sufficiently proven by the testimony of Rebecca Gallagher, taken upon a commission, produced from the files of the county clerk’s office, and read in evidence. The sufficiency of this very…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Lenehan v. College of St. Francis XavierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cahill v. CahillNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. McKenzie v. WoodwardNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Seitz v. MesserschmittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API