Legal Opinion

State v. Hopkins

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1933No. File No. Cr. 103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses contrary to the provisions of § 9968, Comp. Laws 1913. The information charged: “That at said time and place the said defendant, Howard R. Hopkins, did wilfully, unlaw- ' fully, feloniously and fraudulently and with the intent to cheat and defraud John Swanton, as the duly authorized and acting administrator of the estate of Verne W. Parker, deceased, obtained from H. C. Brown, the duly authorized and acting agent of the said John Swanton ns said administrator, the sum of Five Dollars and Seventy' Cents ($5.VO) in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hogue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. State v. McGaheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Sykes v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. State v. StevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Haggerty v. Associated Farmers of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API