Baas v. Society for Christian Instruction
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentBlack, J.
The distinctive facts of this case present anew the most recurrent of all questions arising under the workmen’s compensation law. Did plaintiff’s injury and resultant disablement arise “out of and in the course of” the scope of her employment? The appeal board, relying particularly on the early case of Punches v. American Box Board Co. (1921), 216 Mich 342, answered in the affirmative. Some of my Brethren, relying upon the much more recent case of Murphy v. Flint Board of Education (1946), 314 Mich 226,1 answer in the negative and consequently vote to reverse the board’s award to plaintiff. I…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sheppard v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Kunze v. Detroit Shade Tree Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Thornton v. Luria-Dumes Co-VentureMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Dyer v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.