Legal Opinion

Lentz v. Omar Baking Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1934No. 28604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff by reason of a breach of a warranty by the defendant in the sale of a horse. The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $3,989.35.

The plaintiff, a cripple by reason of an affliction to his hips, walked slowly, awkwardly, and with difficulty. He purchased a horse from the defendant. The defendant’s agents were told about , his'physical condition, his age, sixty-nine years, and his need for a gentle horse. The defendant assured the plaintiff that the horse in question was such an animal. In…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. SchabergNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Vaningan v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Cameron v. MountWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Long v. CarpenterNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Omar Baking Co. v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API