Legal Opinion

Vaningan v. Mueller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The appellant claims as error that: (1)' There was no evidence to warrant submitting the case to the jury and his motion to direct a verdict should have been granted. (2) The court should have submitted questions requested by the defendant whether the plaintiffs were guilty of contributory negligence. (3) The court refused to give instructions requested by the defendant’s counsel. (4) The court received evidence objected to by defendant. (5) The court rejected evidence offered by the defendant. (6) The trial judge presided unfairly to the prejudice of the defendant. (7) The plaintiff husband…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Fox v. KoehnigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Conn v. HunsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Copeland v. DraperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Horne v. MeakinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. PabstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Mateas v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  4. Evans v. UpmierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Moore v. RelishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API