Legal Opinion

Martin v. Glenwood Park Sanatorium

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabicsoN, J.

In this day and age in tbis commonwealth., the wife no longer, as in the days gone by, confines her activities strictly to home and domestic duties. The “help meet” frequently takes her part in industry, not connected with the home. Whether this is for weal or woe, we are not here called upon to determine. This being a fact, the General Assembly of North Carolina, in reference to the wife as a wage-earner, no doubt, in view of this changed condition, passed the provisions in the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act we are now called upon to construe. On the present record the only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Eddington v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Reeves v. . Parker-Graham-Sexton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Rice v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Hewett Ex Rel. Wilson v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Shealy v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Brown v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API