Legal Opinion

Corey v. Radabaugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1927No. 20285. Department OnePublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This is a malpractice case. The complaint alleges that the defendant I. M. Radabaugh negligently treated the plaintiff for ulcer of the cornea of the right eye. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendants have appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

I. M. Radabaugh, who will be spoken of as the appellant, was, at the time of his treatment of the respondent, engaged in practicing the system of healing known as drugless therapeutics. He held a license from the state for that purpose.

Numerous assignments of error have been made which we think may be disposed of more generally. First,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Swanson v. HoodWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Wells v. Ferry-Baker Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sawdey v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Dahl v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Peddicord v. LieserWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API