Legal Opinion
In Re Ingram
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1991No. 90-909PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that respondent be publicly censured based upon the finding of a Hearing Committee, which the Board accepted, that respondent engaged in commingling, DR 9-103(A), by depositing into his personal bank account a check for $6,000 issued to himself and his client in settlement of a personal injury matter. Bar Counsel does not oppose that recommendation. We accept the Board’s findings and recommendation, although we think the conduct in this case comes exceedingly close to deserving the imposition of discipline beyond a public censure. We…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Matter of JonesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- In Re GilchristDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re HaarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re Olekanma A. Ekekwe-KauffmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.