Legal Opinion

United States v. Jeronimo-Bautista

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 12, 2005No. 04-4137PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

Virgilio Jeronimo-Bautista was indicted, in part, for coercing a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct “for the purpose of producing visual depictions of such conduct ... using materials that have been ... transported in interstate and foreign commerce,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). The district court dismissed the charge, concluding that as applied to Mr. Jeronimo-Bautista, § 2251(a) exceeded Congress’ authority under the Commerce Clause. United States v. Jeronimo-Bautista, 319 F.Supp.2d 1272 (D.Utah 2004). The government appeals, and we reverse.

I

This…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Gonzales v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Timothy ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. MalloyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. GrimmettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Sullivan, RogerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API