Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. Huling

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 23, 1884No. 2958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§155. Reconvention; exemplary damages. Where the. plaintiff sued for damages for injury done to his cattle by defendant, and defendant pleaded in reconvention for damages, alleging that plaintiff wilfully and maliciously aliowed and permitted his cattle to break into defendant’s premises, and destroy his crops, held, that this plea in justice’s court was, on general exception made to it, sufficient. .

§ 156. Remitter; in what cases does not cure error. The provisions of the statute in relation to a remitter do not apply in an action to recover damages for a tort. It is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. B. Hardeman & Son v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hughes v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hintze v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  2. Merwin v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
  3. Carpenter v. ThompsonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1825
  4. Orleans County Grammar School v. ParkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
  5. Young v. Arizona Summit Law School LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API