Hughes v. Brooks
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. J. D. McAdoo. The opinion of the court sufficiently indicates the facts of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
The parties to this action appear to be brother and sister. The appellant brought suit against the appellee in the District Court to recover the amount of a certain promissory note calling for two thousand four hundred and eighty-four dollars, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure said note, alleging that the note and mortgage had 'been fraudulently destroyed by the appellee.
The suit was commenced by attachment. The note, as set out in the petition, fell due on the 1st of January, 1870. The petition was filed on the 15th of April, 1869. The attachment was levied on the land encumbered…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Reed v. SamuelsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by5 opinions
- Damron v. Sweetser, Caldwell & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- International & Great Northern Railroad v. WilkesTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Bower v. LivelyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hoskins v. HulingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
- Java Cocoanut Oil Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924