Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fuller v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 1940No. 9376Published

1DissentHealy, Circuit Judge

Appellant’s sole contention here in respect of the insufficiency of the indictment is that the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 prescribes civil penalties only; hence a conspiracy to violate the act is not a conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States, within the meaning of § 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U.S.C.A. § 88. The majority opinion does not discuss this contention, although it appears inferentially, and I think properly, to reject it.

The act prohibits the acquisition or transportation of gold except under conditions to be prescribed by treasury regulations. It is the rule that a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. United States v. HuttoSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Shelp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  5. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API