Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1963No. 36455PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The defendant, Raymond Glenn Russell, appeals from a judgment entered on a verdict of guilty of second-degree burglary and of grand larceny. Both charges arose out of the same transaction, and there is no claim that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the convictions. Each assignment of error relates to the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial because of testimony by the state’s witness, Judy Ann Dreher.

There were three alleged participants in the actual burglary, and Russell’s alleged complicity is predicated upon the state’s claim that he assisted in planning the crime and agreed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DingesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. LewWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. SimmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. RaleighCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. United States v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. RolfeIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Wills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State v. DarlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  4. State v. ColesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Reese v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API