Legal Opinion
Miller v. Toatley
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided June 1, 2000No. 98-373PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court are two motions for summary judgment [docs. 13 & 18]. The first is by defendant the United States of America and the second is by defendant Dr. Donald U. Toatley. These motions are brought pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Since both motions essentially raise the same issue as to whether the United States is a proper party to this lawsuit, the court will address both motions in this ruling. For the following reasons, this court finds that the United States’ motion for summary judgment should be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- The Matter of Zale Corporation, Debtor. Alan D. Feld, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Zale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Steve Williams v. Kelly Adams v. Richard SpurlockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olivera-Pagan v. Manati Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2015
- Baur v. SmithDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2007
- Maschmeier v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Razmzan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021