Legal Opinion

State v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 11, 2010No. 2001-KA-1635PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIACCIO, J.*

| following remand, this matter returns to this court on appeal from the trial court’s determination that defendant, *456James Dunn, is not mentally retarded and is therefore not exempt from capital punishment. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling in that respect. Furthermore, this court’s capital sentence review pursuant to La. Sup.Ct. Rule 28 dictates the death sentence imposed in this case is not disproportionate. The defendant’s sentence of death is therefore affirmed.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts of this crime were adequately set forth in this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ford v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hall v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Brumfield v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Ybarra v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Brumfield v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API