Legal Opinion
Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 28, 2012No. 08-1330-JTMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge.
Defendant XTO Energy, Inc. produces natural gas and related chemical products from wells located in Kansas. The plaintiff Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust (“Roderick”) alleges that XTO has cheated royalty owners by, among other things, deducting from their payments the costs of rendering the gas marketable, in violation of Kansas law. XTO denies the allegation,
The matter is now before the court on Roderick’s Amended Motion for Class Certifieation. (Dkt. 172). For good cause shown, the motion for certification is hereby granted.
Fact…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Rushing v. Alon USA, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013
- Fawcett v. Oil Producers, Inc. of KansasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Foster v. Apache Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012