EHLER ET UX v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*31MILLARD, J.
(Pro Tempore)
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order allowing defendant’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and granting defendant’s motion for a new trial and from an order nunc pro tunc allowing a motion for new trial. The verdict of the jury in the sum of $13,128.50 resulted from the trial of an action wherein these plaintiffs were claiming damages for the burning of their home as a result of the escape of gas from piping owned by defendant located on plaintiffs’ property.
For their first assignment plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in allowing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
- Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Eitel v. Times, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
- McClure v. Hoopeston Gas & Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hendrix v. McKeeOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Roskop Dairy v. GEA Farm Tech.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Harris v. Northwest Natural Gas Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Sims v. DixonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.