Hassard-Short v. Hardison
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil aotiok, tried before Armfield, J., and a jury, at Fall Term, 1894, of Edghecombio Superior Court. There was judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff appealed. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of Associate Justice Eurohes.
1Opinion of the Court
Furches, J.:
This is an action for damages for an alleged breach of contract in defendants’ failing 'o deliver logs, and for other breaches assigned by plaintiff upon a written contract between the parties.
According to the terms of the contract, defendants were to provide and furnish plaintiff a suitable place at Robersonville to put his mill and to furnish plaintiff, at his mill, not less than ten thousand feet of logs per day of specified size and quality, for which plaintiff, at the end of *62each recurring month, was to pay defendants five dollars per thousand, “in cash or its equivalent.”
This…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hassard-Short v. . HardisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hollowell v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Wade v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Snow v. PrinceTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- McFadden v. ShanleyArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Witt v. McCrohanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.