Legal Opinion
Roe v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 2000No. 26248PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILAK, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the magistrate court denying a motion to intervene made by appellant Jane Roe (Roe) in Child Protective Act (CPA) proceedings involving her granddaughter Jane Doe (the Child).
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
A. Facts
Respondents John Doe (John) and Jane Doe I (Jane) were married in February 1987. John and Jane separated in September 1989 *762and were divorced in Santa Cruz County, California in February 1990. Jane had been living with a boyfriend prior to her divorce from John. In late September or early October of 1990, Jane asked if she could spend…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Stockwell v. StockwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re DoeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Idaho Department of Health & Welfare v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 2002